MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975268082 · doi:10.1002/stab.201201569

Die Krone von Vancouver – Erneuerung des BC Place Stadions

2012· article· de· W1975268082 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Knut Göppert, Thomas Moschner, Christoph Paech, Michael Stein, Michaël Werner

Bibliographic record

VenueStahlbau · 2012
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Structural Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Das BC Place Stadion liegt im Herzen von Vancouver, perfekt in das Nordufer des False Creek eingebettet. Das Stadion mit Kapazitäten für 60.000 Zuschauer wurde 1983 eröffnet und war bis zum Abbau des Daches die größte luftgetragene Sporthalle der Welt. Mit zunehmender Nutzungszeit ergaben sich aus dem komplett unter Innendruck stehenden Stadion massive betriebliche Einschränkungen. Luftschleusen für die Zuschauer und auch für die Zugänge in den Innenraum erschwerten die Entleerung des Stadions im Evakuierungsfall. Die hohen Energieaufwendungen für die Gebläse und die Abtauanlage sind heute nicht mehr vermittelbar und erwiesen sich zudem als betriebswirtschaftliches Problem. Zusätzlich wünschte sich einer der beiden Hauptnutzer, die Fußball spielenden Vancouver Whitecaps, Spiele unter freiem Himmel austragen zu können. Desweiteren sollte das gesamte Stadion renoviert und – auch in Bezug auf die sehr hohe Erdbebenbeanspruchung – auf den neuesten sicherheitstechnischen Stand gebracht werden. Mit dem neuen Entwurf wurde eine sehr komplexe Aufgabenstellung bewältigt: Eine moderne Dachkonstruktion mit wandelbarem Innendach wurde auf eine existierende Stahlbetonkonstruktion aufgesetzt. The crown of Vancouver – Revitalisation of the BC Place Stadium. The BC Place Stadium is situated in the city centre of Vancouver directly next to False Creek. The old stadium, with a capacity for 60,000 people, was opened in 1983 until its demolition. It was the world’s largest air dome. With time, massive operational constraints appeared due to the fully inflated inner space of the air dome. Emergency evacuation of the stadium was complicated due to required air locks on spectator and access routes. The high energy consumption for the inflation units and the snow melting system were not practical anymore and were an economical problem for the user. In addition one of the two main users, the Vancouver Whitecaps, always wanted to have the possibility to play open air. Furthermore, the complete stadium complex had to be renovated and – with regard to the massive seismic demands on the structure – updated to the state of the art. With the new design a very complex task has been solved: A state of the art roof structure with a retractable inner roof was added onto an existing concrete bowl structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStahlbauSame topicCivil and Structural Engineering ResearchFrench-language works237,207