Constitutive expression of the 25-kDa heat shock protein Hsp25 reveals novel parasagittal bands of Purkinje cells in the adult mouse cerebellar cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the reported absence of the 25-kDa heat shock protein Hsp25 in the rodent cerebellum, we have determined that Hsp25 is constitutively expressed in a subset of Purkinje cells in the adult cerebellum of the mouse. No other cerebellar neurons are Hsp25 immunoreactive, but there is weak staining associated with blood vessels. In the vermis, Hsp25-immunoreactive Purkinje cells are confined to two regions: one in lobules VI/VII, the other in lobules IX/X. In each region, only a subset of the Purkinje cells is immunoreactive. These cells are grouped in five parasagittal bands arranged symmetrically about the midline. The boundaries of these expression domains correspond to transverse zones previously inferred from other expression patterns. A third Hsp25-immunopositive domain is seen in the paraflocculus and flocculus. Again, only a subset of Purkinje cells within the paraflocculus and flocculus express Hsp25, revealing three distinct bands. Previous descriptions of compartmentation antigens have not differentiated between adult populations of Purkinje cells in these regions, suggesting that Hsp25 is a novel compartmentation antigen in the adult cerebellum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".