MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Action of Plant Sterol Intervention on Sterol Kinetics in Hypercholesterolemic Men with High versus Low Basal Circulatory Plant Sterol Concentrations

2011· article· en· W1975303523 on OpenAlexaff
Hai Lin Zhao, Adrielle H Houweling, Catherine A. Vanstone, Stephanie Jew, Elke A. Trautwein, Guus Duchateau, Peter J.H. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Nutrition · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySte. Anne's HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCampesterolCholesterolSterolCrossover studyChemistryInternal medicineEndocrinologyAbsorption (acoustics)PlaceboBiologyBiochemistryMedicineMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The relationship between plant sterol (PS) absorption and circulatory concentrations with cholesterol absorption and biosynthesis during PS consumption has yet to be clearly elucidated in humans. It is therefore essential to examine campesterol, β-sitosterol, and cholesterol absorption and cholesterol fractional synthesis rate (FSR) following PS consumption in individuals with high versus low basal circulatory PS concentrations. DESIGN: A randomized, crossover trial was conducted in 82 hypercholesterolemic men consuming spreads with or without 2 g/d of PS for two 4-week periods, each separated by a 4-week washout. Endpoint tracer enrichments after ingestion of (2)H-labeled campesterol or β-sitosterol and (13)C-labeled cholesterol were determined by isotope ratio mass spectrometry. RESULTS: For both phases of dietary intervention, the endpoint cholesterol absorption index was positively correlated with campesterol (r = 0.5864, p < 0.0001) and β-sitosterol (r = 0.4676, p < 0.0001) absorption indices; inversely, endpoint cholesterol FSR correlated negatively with the absorption indices of campesterol (r = -0.5004, p < 0.0009), β-sitosterol (r = -0.4154, p < 0.05), and cholesterol (r = -0.4056, p < 0.0001). PS intervention reduced absorption indices of campesterol, β-sitosterol, and cholesterol by 36.5% ± 2.7%, 39.3% ± 2.9%, and 34.3% ± 1.9%, respectively, but increased cholesterol FSR by 33.0% ± 3.3% relative to control. Endpoint circulatory PS levels (cholesterol adjusted) were positively associated with endpoint absorption indices of campesterol (r = 0.5586, p < 0.0001, for placebo; r = 0.6530, p < 0.0001, for PS intake) and cholesterol (r = 0.3683, p < 0.001 for placebo; r = 0.3469, p < 0.002, for PS intake) and were negatively associated with cholesterol FSR (r = -0.3551, p < 0.002, for placebo; r = -0.3643, p < 0.001, for PS intake). The cholesterol-lowering effect of PS was most pronounced among individuals falling within the 50th-75th percentiles of basal PS concentrations. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that basal PS concentrations indicate not only sterol absorption efficiency but also the extent of PS-induced cholesterol reduction and thus might be clinically useful to predict the extent of cholesterol response to PS intervention within a given individual.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of NutritionSame topicCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismFrench-language works237,207