MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975333498 · doi:10.1109/coase.2014.6899462

Applications of data assimilation to forecasting indoor environment

2014· article· en· W1975333498 on OpenAlexaff
Cheng-Chun Lin, Liangzhu Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Institute of Standards and Technology
KeywordsData assimilationEnsemble Kalman filterMeteorologyComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceKalman filterComputationNumerical weather predictionAssimilation (phonology)Numerical modelsComputer simulationSimulationAlgorithmExtended Kalman filterArtificial intelligenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data assimilation (DA) is a technique to combine numerical predictions and experimental measurements, which has been commonly used by the community of numerical weather forecasting but is relatively new to the field of indoor environment. Among all data assimilation methods, Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) is especially suitable to solve large-scale nonlinear problems due to its low computation requirement. In this paper, two new applications of EnKF to forecasting indoor environment are presented. The first study is to forecast the contaminant transport in a residential house based on a multi-room tracer gas decay experiment. The forecast model avoids calculating source term in the given problem by rapid updating model states with EnKF while still providing significant forecast lead time. The second study is to predict the fire smoke dispersion in a multi-room compartment fire without giving actual heat release rates (HRRs) as model inputs. Compared to conventional deterministic models, the EnKF models improve the predictions significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207