MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975372876 · doi:10.1243/09544070jauto43

A non-linear dynamic approach to the motion of four-wheel-steering vehicles under various operation conditions

2008· article· en· W1975372876 on OpenAlexaff
Qiang Han, Liming Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorque steeringControl theory (sociology)Vehicle dynamicsAutomotive engineeringMotion (physics)Steering linkageStability (learning theory)DragSteering wheelComputer scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to analyse systematically the non-linear dynamic behaviour of four-wheel-steering (4WS) vehicles. A practical non-linear dynamic model of multiple degrees of freedom for 4WS vehicles is established. The non-linear model presented is shown to be feasible for the vehicles under normal and the other operation manoeuvres. Compared with those of documented investigations, this model may be employed to analyse the motions of the vehicle and motions of the vehicle wheels in turning and braking processes together with the consideration of the effects of air drag and wind. Numerical simulation for the motion of the 4WS vehicles under various operation manoeuvres is performed with the model established. Comparison of the behaviours of 4WS and two-wheel-steering vehicles is also presented with respect to the inputs on the steering system, the manoeuvrability, the stability, and the relationship between the steering phase and vehicle speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile EngineeringSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207