MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975408410 · doi:10.1021/cm901751g

Mechanism of Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate Kidney Stones Formation: Layered Spherulitic Growth

2010· article· en· W1975408410 on OpenAlexafffund
Usama Al-Atar, Alexei A. Bokov, Joel M.H. Teichman, Byron D. Gates, Zuo‐Guang Ye, Neil R. Branda

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCalcium oxalateKidney stonesCalciumMechanism (biology)Calcium Oxalate CrystalsMaterials scienceOxalateChemical engineeringChemistryMineralogyInorganic chemistryMetallurgyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The morphology of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) kidney stones is studied using polarized light microscopy and X-ray diffraction. We show that polycrystalline structure of COM stones exhibits spherulitic texture where the arrangement of crystallites indicates that their fast growth direction is perpendicular to the corresponding radius of spherulite, resulting in the layered morphology. This is in contrast to “normal” spherulites, where the crystal growth process leads to the formation of a radiating array of fiber crystallites. We demonstrate that COM stones consist of spherulitic domains. The domains have the shape of comparatively narrow randomly distorted cones in which the crystallites form strong texture, so that their crystallographic axes have almost the same directions and the [100] crystallographic planes are nearly perpendicular to the radial direction of the domain. However, the order among the domains does not exist. Deviations of their radial directions from the corresponding radial directions of the whole stone are not large as a rule, while the other crystallographic directions of the domains are randomly distributed. A model of layered spherulitic growth explaining the observed morphology is proposed. The model suggests that every domain is formed by means of a continuous crystallization process periodically inhibited by precipitation of organic material so that alternating organic and polycrystalline layers appear. Fine crystalline channels remaining in organic layers connect neighboring crystalline layers and maintain, thereby, the coherence of crystal structure all over the domain. Preformed COM microcrystals occasionally adsorbed from urine on the surface of the growing organic layer serve as seeds for new spherulitic domains. The results are important for understanding the general principles of biomineralization, and spherulitic crystallization and could lead to the development of new strategies for preventing kidney stone formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207