Enabling an Enhanced Data-as-a-Service Ecosystem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sharing of large and interesting Big Data in cloud environments can be achieved using data-as-a-service, where a provider offers data to interested users. In enhanced data-as-a-service, the data provider also supplies compute infrastructure, allowing users to run analytics tasks local to the data and reducing the (expensive and slow) transmission of data over networks. This paper describes a services-based ecosystem that allows providers to precisely share portions of their data with users, using a model where users submit MapReduce jobs that run on the provider's Hadoop infrastructure. Providers are given mechanisms to filter, segment, and/or transform data before it reaches the user's task. The ecosystem also allows for intermediaries who offer value-added filtrations, segmentations, or transformations of the data (for example, pre-filtering a dataset to only include high-income users). We describe the RESTful services required to enable this ecosystem, introduce a prototype to demonstrate the concept, and present experiments using this ecosystem to both provide and analyze different segments of a single large data set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".