MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W197543336 · doi:10.1021/jp8076479

Bright White Upconversion Emission from Tm<sup>3+</sup>/Yb<sup>3+</sup>/Er<sup>3+</sup>-Doped Lu<sub>3</sub>Ga<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> Nanocrystals

2008· article· en· W197543336 on OpenAlexaff
Venkataramanan Mahalingam, Francesca Mangiarini, Fiorenzo Vetrone, V. Venkatramu, Marco Bettinelli, Adolfo Speghini, John A. Capobianco

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhoton upconversionMaterials scienceLaserDopingOpticsNanocrystalLuminescenceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)White lightOptoelectronicsPhysicsChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the synthesis of Tm 3+ /Yb 3+ /Er 3+ -doped Lu 3 Ga 5 O 12 nanocrystals prepared by a simple sol−gel method exhibiting bright white light following excitation with lower energy near-infrared light (λ exc = 980 nm) via an upconversion process. The combination of upconverted blue (from Tm 3+ ), green, and red (from Er 3+ ) emissions resulted in the white luminescence, which is intense and visible to the naked eye at a laser power less than 30 mW (3.4 W/cm 2 ). The calculated Commission internationale de l′éclairage (CIE) color coordinates, which is the standard reference for defining colors, fall well within the white region and shift only slightly with the incident laser powers indicating that the material might be promising for the development of devices such as white light lasers and LEDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations148
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207