MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W197543336 · doi:10.1021/jp8076479

Bright White Upconversion Emission from Tm<sup>3+</sup>/Yb<sup>3+</sup>/Er<sup>3+</sup>-Doped Lu<sub>3</sub>Ga<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> Nanocrystals

2008· article· en· W197543336 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhoton upconversionMaterials scienceLaserDopingOpticsNanocrystalLuminescenceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)White lightOptoelectronicsPhysicsChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the synthesis of Tm 3+ /Yb 3+ /Er 3+ -doped Lu 3 Ga 5 O 12 nanocrystals prepared by a simple sol−gel method exhibiting bright white light following excitation with lower energy near-infrared light (λ exc = 980 nm) via an upconversion process. The combination of upconverted blue (from Tm 3+ ), green, and red (from Er 3+ ) emissions resulted in the white luminescence, which is intense and visible to the naked eye at a laser power less than 30 mW (3.4 W/cm 2 ). The calculated Commission internationale de l′éclairage (CIE) color coordinates, which is the standard reference for defining colors, fall well within the white region and shift only slightly with the incident laser powers indicating that the material might be promising for the development of devices such as white light lasers and LEDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it