MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975458143 · doi:10.3821/1913-701x-145.1.7

Legislative Change in Quebec Gives Pharmacists Expanded Authorities

2012· article· en· W1975458143 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kathie Lynas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacistLegislatureMedical prescriptionMedicineFamily medicinePharmacyPillHealth careChemistNursingPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pharmacists in Quebec are gaining prescribing privileges and other expanded authorities in line with changes that have been made in other provinces. Quebec Health Minister Yves Bolduc introduced Bill 41 in the National Assembly on November 15, 2011, and it was passed December 8. The changes will allow Quebec pharmacists to extend or adjust certain prescriptions, administer some injections for education purposes and order lab tests to ensure appropriate uses of medication. In addition, pharmacists will be permitted to prescribe medications that don't require a diagnosis. Examples include folic acid and anti-nausea medication for pregnant women, malaria pills for travellers and smoking cessation medications. “We are confident these new activities will give patients better access to the health care system and will give pharmacists the ability to better manage drug therapy,” says Diane Lamarre, president of the province's pharmacist regulatory body, l'Ordre des pharmaciens du Quebec. Access is very important, she notes, given that around 2 million Quebec residents are without a family physician.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du CanadaSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207