Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Information in the data often has far fewer degrees of freedom than the number of variables encoding the data. Dimensionality reduction attempts to reduce the number of variables used to describe the data. In this article, we shall survey some dimension reduction techniques that are robust. We consider linear dimension reduction first and describe robust principal component analysis ( PCA ) using three approaches. The first approach uses a singular value decomposition of a robust covariance matrix. The second approach employs robust measures of dispersion to realize PCA as a robust projection pursuit. The third approach uses a low‐rank plus sparse decomposition of the data matrix. We also survey robust approaches to nonlinear dimension reduction under a unifying framework of kernel PCA . By using a kernel trick, the robust methods available for PCA can be extended to nonlinear cases. WIREs Comput Stat 2015, 7:63–69. doi: 10.1002/wics.1331 This article is categorized under: Statistical Learning and Exploratory Methods of the Data Sciences > Manifold Learning Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Robust Methods
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it