MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975489645 · doi:10.1159/000120533

Apnea in Patients with Myelomeningocele

2008· article· en· W1975489645 on OpenAlexaff
D. Douglas Cochrane, Robert Adderley, Campbell White, Mikael Norman, Paul Steinbok

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Neurosurgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineApneaHydrocephalusSurgeryComplicationChiari malformationAnesthesiaSyringomyeliaMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apnea is a known complication of the Chiari II malformation presenting in infancy. Obstructive apnea secondary to bilateral abductor palsy or laryngomalacia and centrally mediated expiratory apnea with cyanosis can occur. Observations of 9 patients suggest that these forms of apnea may represent stages in a continuum of brain stem dysfunction due to the combined effects of the hindbrain malformation and its compression, hydrocephalus and progressive arachnoiditis. Obstructive apnea in some patients may be reversed by optimal control of hydrocephalus with or without cervical decompression. These patients may also develop episodes of cyanotic expiratory apnea of central origin (PEAC). This form of apnea does not respond to surgical or medical treatment and may show progressive worsening over time. Five of 6 patients with this form of apneic spell died suddenly, 2 of these died despite full recuscitative efforts. It is recommended that reports of treatment address results for both forms of apnea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations83
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric NeurosurgerySame topicSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsFrench-language works237,207