MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975513891 · doi:10.1086/429790

High‐Mass Star Formation. I. The Mass Distribution of Submillimeter Clumps in NGC 7538

2005· article· en· W1975513891 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Reid, C. D. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJames Clerk Maxwell TelescopePhysicsAstrophysicsBolometerMillimeterStar formationSpectral indexMass distributionSubmillimeter ArrayAstronomyPower lawTelescopeGalaxyFar infraredMolecular cloudRADIUSInfraredStarsSpectral lineOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present submillimeter continuum maps at 450 and 850 microns of a 12 x 8 arcminute region of the NGC 7538 high-mass star-forming region, made using the Submillimeter Common-User Bolometer Array (SCUBA) on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. We used an automated clump-finding algorithm to identify 67 clumps in the 450 micron image and 77 in the 850 micron image. Contrary to previous studies, we find a positive correlation between high spectral index, alpha, and high submillimeter flux, with the difference being accounted for by different treatments of the error beam. We interpret the higher spectral index at submillimeter peaks as a reflection of elevated dust temperature, particularly when there is an embedded infrared source, though it may also reflect changing dust properties. The clump mass-radius relationship is well-fit by a power law of the form M \\propto R^(-x) with x = 1.5-2.1, consistent with theories of turbulently-supported clumps. According to our most reliable analysis, the high-mass end (approx. 100-2700 M_sun) of the submillimeter clump mass function in NGC 7538 follows a Salpeter-like power law with index 2.0 +/- 0.3. This result agrees well with similar studies of lower-mass regions rho Oph and Orion B. We interpret the apparent invariance of the shape of the clump mass function over a broad range of parent cloud masses as evidence for the self-similarity of the physical processes which determine it. This result is consistent with models which suggest that turbulent fragmentation, acting at early times, is sufficient to set the clump mass function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207