Effects of Salt Deposition from Salt Water Spray on Lowbush Blueberry Shoots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Many commercial lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) fields border the Bay of Fundy and the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Qualitative producer observations in these areas indicate that salt spray from the marine environment during winter months reduces yield of the lowbush blueberry. To quantitatively examine the effects of ocean spray on the lowbush blueberry, the amount of salt deposited on stems of this species was assessed at several commercial sites in the Canadian provinces of Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia between 1998 and 2000. Randomly selected areas of commercial fields were protected with 1.8 m × 0.45 m (5.9 ft × 1.48 ft) shelters covered with 4 mil plastic film. Data on growth, yield, and salt deposition on shoots were recorded from both protected and exposed plants. Results varied according to location, weather conditions, and snow cover. Tree line wind protection and snow cover appeared to reduce the severity of salt spray-induced damage to the lowbush blueberry. In general, the exposed plants exhibited more salt deposition (mg g−1 dry weight of stems), more dead buds, fewer blossoms and lower yields in comparison to covered specimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".