Bibliographic record
Abstract
À Sulawesi, en Indonésie orientale, protégés par une région montagneuse et isolée, les Toraja Sa’dan ont subi la colonisation hollandaise plutôt tardivement (à partir de 1905). En dépit des conflits interreligieux qui ont marqué le XXe siècle, le syncrétisme constitue aujourd’hui encore une réalité quotidienne, rassemblant notamment les chrétiens (protestants, catholiques, pentecôtistes...), les musulmans et les derniers pratiquants des cultes autochtones. Le rapide essor du tourisme a ébranlé les valeurs et les habitudes des villageois, tout en proposant une autre voie d’affirmation de l’identité culturelle des Toraja. C’est dans ce contexte que les fêtes « traditionnelles », en particulier celles liées au culte des morts, connaissent une nouvelle vie, non sans transformations irrémédiables. La mise en tourisme de la société n’occulte pas encore la ritualisation du spectacle de la mort. Cette contribution évoque tour à tour l’histoire de la difficile relation entre politique et religion en terre toraja et les liens étroits entre politique, tourisme et sacré, à travers la culture et les cérémonies religieuses locales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".