MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975571422 · doi:10.1109/icar.2013.6766524

Overcoming occlusions in semi-autonomous telepresence systems

2013· article· en· W1975571422 on OpenAlexaff
Sina Radmard, Elizabeth A. Croft

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeleroboticsComputer scienceOperator (biology)Computer visionTeleoperationKinematicsHuman–computer interactionConversationInverse kinematicsRobotArtificial intelligenceVisualizationSimulationMobile robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present an occlusion handling system, applied to articulated telepresence platforms, that simultaneously reduces the control burden on the operator and ensures the continuity of the visual interaction. Articulated telepresence systems improve the sense of presence of the operator by allowing the operator to maintain facial contact even during a walking conversation. However, the additional control of the articulated system, along with controlling navigation and carrying on a conversation can distract the operator and degrade the telepresence experience for both parties. Thus, we propose a semi-autonomous system that, along with visual tracking, can help relieve the burden of managing the articulated platform by clearing occlusions that might arise between the telepresense platform and the second party (the interlocuter). In particular, we demonstrate the application of a lost target recovery algorithm (LTRA) in a telepresence system. As the nature of a telepresence system requires fast recovery from occlusions through smooth motions, we improve the applied LTRA performance by adopting a numerical Inverse Kinematics solver and introducing a Cartesian space sampling method to generate optimal clearing motions. Finally, to validate different occlusion clearing methods, we implement them on an articulated telepresense platform. Experimental results for various scenarios support the feasibility of our approach to quickly recover visual contact in telepresence systems communications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207