MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975613720 · doi:10.1061/40994(321)82

''Carpet Center of the World'' Is Guaranteed a Long Term Water Supply

2008· article· en· W1975613720 on OpenAlexaff
Allison Psutka, Mark A. Buckner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsResearch Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline transportPipeline (software)MileEnvironmental scienceTransformerWater supplyComputer scienceEngineeringCivil engineeringElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringEnvironmental engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dalton Utilities constructed approximately 14 miles of water transmission main in 1962 and 1972 using 30" and 36" Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe (PCCP). This pipeline runs from the water treatment plant through the center of their service area and also serves the Dalton carpet industry, the largest concentration of carpet manufacturers in the world, and thus is one of the most critical lines in the system. Dalton Utilities had experienced a failure on this line in 2005 and was very concerned about its condition. They had secured an estimate for replacing the line, and considered the operational impact of doing so. This option was not attractive. Dalton Utilities needed a complete investigation into the current condition of the line to determine what to do next. The Pressure Pipe Inspection Company was engaged in the summer of 2006 to plan a project that would identify distress in a 3.08 mile section of this pipeline. This paper will discuss the details and outcome of this project including the method used to precisely determine the existing condition of the PCCP water transmission main: Remote Field Transformer Couple (RFTC). Additionally it will cover the next steps taken by Dalton Utilities for rehabilitation and further inspections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207