MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Frequency Domain Packet Scheduling with MIMO for 3GPP LTE Downlink

2013· article· en· W1975627893 on OpenAlexaff
Yinsheng Xu, Hongkun Yang, Fengyuan Ren, Chuang Lin, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Telecommunications linkApproximation algorithmSubmodular set functionMathematical optimizationJob shop schedulingOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingGreedy algorithmAlgorithmSubcarrierMathematicsComputer networkChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we formalize a general Frequency Domain Packet Scheduling (FDPS) problem for 3GPP LTE Downlink (DL). The DL FDPS problem incorporates the SingleUser Multiple Input Multiple Output (SU-MIMO) technique, and can express various scheduling policies, including the Proportional-Fair metric, the MaxWeight scheduling, etc. For LTE DL SU-MIMO, the constraint of selecting only one MIMO mode (transmit diversity or spatial multiplexing) per user in each transmission time interval (TTI) increases the hardness of the FDPS problem. We prove the problem is MAX SNP-hard, which implies approximation algorithms with constant approximation ratios are the best we can expect. Subsequently, we propose an approximation algorithm of polynomial runtime. The solution is based on a greedy method for maximizing a non-decreasing submodular function over a matroid. The algorithm can solve the general DL FDPS problem with an approximation ratio of 4. We implement the proposed algorithm and compare its performance with other well-known schedulers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207