GAS TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT AT THE EXIT PLANE OF A TYPICAL GAS TURBINE COMBUSTOR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes an attempt to use a technique called thin filament pyrometry (TFP) to measure simultaneously multiple temperature lines at the exit plane of a gas turbine combustor. This technique diverges significantly from the widely used setup that characterizes the TFP method [W. M. Pitts, H. C. Smyth, and D. A. Everest in 27th Symp. (Intl.) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 563−569, 1998; V. Vilimpoc and L. P. Goss in 22nd Symp. (Intl.) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 1907−1917, 1988; W. M. Pitts in 26th Symp. (Intl.) on Combustion, pp. 1171−1179, 1996; P. B. Kuhn, B. Ma, B. C. Connelly, M. D. Smooke, and M. B. Long in Proc. 33rd Int. Symp. on Combustion, pp. 743−750, 2010]. Although the same physics apply, the approach will be discussed to indicate required changes. The experiment will utilize multiple 15-µm β-SiC fibers, which will be simultaneously imaged at 10,300 points over a total length of 525 mm. Typically, the measurable temperature range is known to be between 500 and 2100 K with the proper filter, the temperature range having a spatial resolution of ~100 µm, a temporal resolution of 1.5 ms, and an accuracy of 1.5 ± 1.0 K for temperature on the order of 2000 K [Kuhn et al., 2010]. Unlike usual TFP experiments, the filament will be calibrated with a thermocouple, with data from a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) gas analyzer allowing a thermochemical equilibrium calculation to provide low but sufficient accuracy. Temperature at different positions along the filament will then be determined by recording relative emission intensities and assuming that the filament acts as a gray body emitter. The calibrated TFP would then be used to make a multiple-filament temperature measurement across the exit plane of a typical combustion chamber at various operating conditions. For each flame type, emissions measured with an FTIR and a calibration done with thermocouples are both necessary to provide knowledge of flow temperature and molecular composition. The flow conditions need to be well characterized to provide enough accuracy with the technique. Most studies were done with laminar diffusion flames. The case under study is a highly turbulent high-speed gas flow. The convective properties are to be validated and the mechanical resistance of the 15-µm β-SiC fibers is to be demonstrated under relatively much harsher conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".