MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975646222 · doi:10.3348/kjr.2008.9.1.19

18F-FDG PET versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for Adrenal Gland Lesion Characterization: a Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy in Lung Cancer Patients

2008· article· en· W1975646222 on OpenAlexaff
Yon Mi Sung, Kyung Soo Lee, Byung-Tae Kim, Joon Young Choi, Myung Jin Chung, Young Mog Shim, Chin A Yi, Taesung Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueKorean Journal of Radiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
FundersRadiological Society of North America
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerAdrenal glandPET-CTNuclear medicineLesionLungPositron emission tomographyCancerRadiologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of integrated PET/CT using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the differentiation of benign and metastatic adrenal gland lesions in patients with lung cancer and to compare the diagnostic efficacy with the use of PET alone. Materials and Methods:Sixty-one adrenal lesions (size range, 5 104 mm; mean size, 16 mm) were evaluated retrospectively in 42 lung cancer patients.Both PET images alone and integrated PET/CT images were assessed, respectively, at two-month intervals.PET findings were interpreted as positive if the FDG uptake of adrenal lesions was greater than or equal to that of the liver, and the PET/CT findings were interpreted as positive if an adrenal lesion show attenuation > 10 HU and showed increased FDG uptake.Final diagnoses of adrenal gland lesions were made at clinical follow-up (n = 52) or by a biopsy (n = 9) when available.The diagnostic accuracies of PET and PET/CT for the characterization of adrenal lesions were compared using the McNemar test.Results: Thirty-five (57%) of the 61 adrenal lesions were metastatic and the remaining 26 lesions were benign.For the depiction of adrenal gland metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET were 74%, 73%, and 74%, respectively, whereas those of integrated PET/CT were 80%, 89%, and 84%, respectively (p values; 0.5, 0.125, and 0.031, respectively).Conclusion: The use of integrated PET/CT is more accurate than the use of PET alone for differentiating benign and metastatic adrenal gland lesions in lung cancer patients.drenal metastases are frequently noted in patients with lung cancer (1); however, the majority of adrenal lesions are likely to be benign, even in lung cancer patients (2 5).The reported incidence of adrenal lesions in lung cancer patients, regardless as to whether they are due to metastasis, varies from 4% to 18% in clinical studies (3, 6, 7), and up to 40% of these lesions may be malignant and present as solitary sites of metastasis (8).Therefore, it is essential to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions in lung cancer patients to ensure optimal management.The percutaneous biopsy is the gold standard for confirming the status of adrenal lesions, but is invasive and difficult to perform, and thus frequently leads to complications or study failure (9).Noninvasive imaging methods have been examined in terms of their abilities to determine adrenal lesion status.Chemical shift MR imaging is found to be useful for differentiating between benign and malignant adrenal lesions (10, 11).CT has proven useful in this context because of its ability to measure attenuation, on both unenhanced images and on delayed contrast-enhanced images (12 14).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKorean Journal of RadiologySame topicAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsFrench-language works237,207