MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975656210 · doi:10.4000/remi.4968

Los chilenos en el exterior : ¿ De la emigración y el exilio a la diáspora ? El caso de Montréal

2004· article· es· W1975656210 on OpenAlex
José Luís del Pozo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue européenne de migrations internationales · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse le cas des Chiliens émigrés dans une perspective socio-historique. L’auteur identifie d’abord trois étapes. Avant 1973, les flux d’émigrants, parmi lesquels on peut repérer quelques cas isolés d’exilés, se sont dirigés surtout vers l’Argentine. Le coup d’état de 1973 amène un changement quantitatif et qualitatif, car il est à l’origine de la sortie massive des Chiliens, cette fois en tant qu’exilés, et qui partent vers des destinations très diverses. À partir de 1990, la fin de la dictature suscite un certain nombre de retours au pays, mais d’autres Chiliens quittent le pays en tant qu’émigrants.L’article s’interroge ensuite sur l’existence d’une diaspora constituée par le nombre relativement élevé de Chiliens établi à l’extérieur. Après une revue de plusieurs éléments de définition de ce concept, il conclut, à partir du cas des Chiliens de Montréal, qu’il n’est que partiellement pertinent, mais qu’il le sera peut-être davantage dans un futur proche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it