MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975664670 · doi:10.1623/hysj.52.2.318

Intégration d'un filtre de Kalman dans le modèle hydrologique HBV pour la prévision des débits

2007· article· fr· W1975664670 on OpenAlexaff
Rim Ouachani, Zoubeïda Bargaoui, Taha B. M. J. Ouarda

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Sciences Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsForestryPhilosophyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un filtre de Kalman standard a été développé en vue de la mise à jour de certaines variables d'état de la fonction du sous-sol et de la sortie du modèle HBV. La version globale du modèle HBV, fonctionnant au pas de temps horaire, a été calée par essais et erreurs sur les bassins tunisiens des Oueds Barbara et Mellila. Le pas de temps journalier a été considéré pour évaluer la qualité de la reconstitution. Le modèle a été ensuite couplé avec le filtre en reformulant le modèle conceptuel en un système d'équations d'état dynamiques et en implémentant la procédure du filtre de Kalman. L'hydrogramme des débits horaires constitue la mesure introduite pour la correction des états. Malgré un choix suivant la littérature des erreurs sur les mesures et les états du système, ce filtre a permis de réduire nettement l'incertitude sur le débit engendré par le processus pluie—débit et la pluie d'entrée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrological Sciences JournalSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207