MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975665871 · doi:10.1021/ef049951e

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Photoelectron Energy Loss Spectroscopy, X-ray Excited Auger Electron Spectroscopy, and Time-of-Flight−Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy Studies of Asphaltenes from Doba−Chad Heavy Crude Hydrovisbreaking

2004· article· en· W1975665871 on OpenAlexaff
Faı̈çal Larachi, Soumaı̈ne Dehkissia, A. Adnot, E. Chornet

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Auger electron spectroscopyElectron spectroscopyElectron energy loss spectroscopySpectroscopyMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sp 2 -to-sp 3 carbon bonding character in asphaltenes that results from heavy crude visbreaking was evaluated by means of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), photoelectron energy loss spectroscopy (ESCALOSS), X-ray excited Auger spectroscopy (XAES), and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF−SIMS). The asphaltenes were precipitated from virgin Doba−Chad heavy crude or from treated crudes after undergoing noncatalytic and (FeS and MoS 2 mediated) catalytic hydrovisbreaking to reduce heavy crude viscosity for meeting pipeline transportation specifications. The sp 2 and sp 3 characters of the asphaltenes were calibrated using, respectively, highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) and diamond. Composites of asphaltenes with polyethylene and polystyrene references were used to assess the shift from sp 3 - to sp 2 -dominated structures. It was postulated that the π aromatic character in the asphaltenes condensed polynuclear aromatic rings correlates with sp 2 carbon, whereas the asphaltenes aliphatic character correlates with sp 3 carbon. Percentages of sp 2 sites ranged between 36% and 70% for all the asphaltenes samples with values from XPS being underestimated, with respect to XAES. The splitting between the principal nonloss C 1s line and the largest plasmon loss peak, and the evolution in shape of the π → π* plasmon satellite in the energy loss spectra were in qualitative agreement with XPS and XAES data. In addition to aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbon ion fragments, the high sensitivity of TOF−SIMS allowed the detection of several hetero-elements (such as nickel, vanadium, sulfur, and nitrogen, in the organometallic-bearing asphaltenes, or iron, chlorine, sodium, potassium, and silicon, as foreign elements). Probing the surface composition through the ΣCH x + /C 2 + ratio indicated that asphaltenes were bearing more aliphatic character than the carbon blacks or graphite, presumably because of the presence of hydrogen during hydrovisbreaking. However, surface probing via the C 2 H - /C 2 - ratio suggested that asphaltenes were less aromatic, as expected, than graphite while exhibiting an aromatic character close to that of some carbon blacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207