Leisure and recreational “girl‐boy” activities—studying the unique challenges provided by transgendered young people
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Transgendered young people—transsexuals, cross‐dressers, gender benders/ blenders—challenge recreation and leisure professionals because their gender identity and expressions differ from society's role expectations of what it means to be male or female. These young people confront traditional “girl‐boy” activities associated with gender stereotyping. An exploratory study of 22 male‐to‐female transgendered young people discovered they knew that they were transgendered and acted on their gender‐non‐conforming behaviours at an early age; and they behaved in gender atypical ways, e.g., liking dolls, preferring female playmates, never preferring boys’ games and never imaging themselves as sports figures. Outcomes of this exploratory study are used to generate directions for research that would enhance research‐based programming conducive to transgendered young people's participation in recreation and leisure activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it