MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975678813 · doi:10.1049/iet-map:20060283

Analytical equivalence between substrate-integrated waveguide and rectangular waveguide

2008· article· en· W1975678813 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquivalence (formal languages)Conformal mapWaveguideModalElectrical impedanceOpticsMathematicsMaterials scienceMathematical analysisPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rectangular waveguide (RW) with sidewalls of vertical conducting cylinders (i.e. SIW, substrate-integrated waveguide) becomes popular with the advent of low-temperature co-fired ceramic structure; its analysis is usually numerical, or modal, leading to empirical design formulas. However, its analytical equivalence to the common RW of the solidwall is identified; in other words, analytical design formulas of the SIW and the equivalent RW of solid sidewalls are the same. The equivalence is established on comparing the surface impedances along the side walls, of the SIW and of an RW through analytical continuation. The equivalence formulas, propagation and cut off frequency show very good agreement with the results from both numerical simulations and measurements of hardware experiments, and over wide frequencies. The good agreements are easily understood on the basis of the conformal maps and the variational principle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it