MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975709959 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2014.7039508

Optimal position seeking for unmanned aerial vehicle communication relay using only signal strength and angle of arrival

2014· article· en· W1975709959 on OpenAlexafffund
Abbas Chamseddine, Guillaume Charland-Arcand, Ouassima Akhrif, Samuel Gagné, François Gagnon, Denis Couillard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtremum Seeking Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUltra Electronics (Canada)École de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRelayBase stationPosition (finance)Computer scienceSignal strengthTrajectoryStability (learning theory)Base (topology)SIGNAL (programming language)SimulationEngineeringReal-time computingTelecommunicationsAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the problem of communication relay between ground units using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The positions of the ground units are considered to be unavailable to the UAV and the objective is to drive the vehicle in real-time to the optimal placement maximizing the strength of communication signals from ground units. To this end, a novel non model-based navigation law is proposed that is solely based on signals strength and their angles of arrival. The stability of the proposed navigation law is proved in two scenarios, driving the UAV to the optimal placement and returning it back to the launch base. Simulation and experimental results are given to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExtremum Seeking Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207