Confirmation of quantitative trait loci for cocaine-induced activation in the AcB/BcA series of recombinant congenic strains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individual differences in the psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine are influenced by genetic factors. Several quantitative trait loci (QTL) have been identified for cocaine-induced locomotor activation using the AXB/BXA recombinant inbred series of strains derived from the A/J (A) and C57BL/6J (B6). The aim of the present study was to conduct an independent analysis of cocaine-induced activation in the AcB/BcA recombinant congenic strains. The AcB/BcA RC series consists of 37 inbred strains derived from reciprocal backcrosses between the A and B6, followed by systematic inbreeding. Locomotor activity was measured in a computerized open-field apparatus following intraperitoneal administration of saline and cocaine (20 mg/kg). Linkage maps constructed with 625 informative microsatellite markers were used to identify chromosomal regions associated with cocaine difference scores. Significant (P < 0.00001) regions were identified on chromosomes 1 (13-25.7 and 36.9-58.5 cM), 5 (1-28 and 84-86 cM), 6 (7-26.35 cM), 7 (9.4-27.8 cM), 9 (9-28 cM), 13 (21-37 cM), 16 (36-66 cM), 17 (22.5-24.5 cM) and 18 (45-48 cM). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that a subset of four markers, including D5Mit182 (24 cM), D5Mit409 (84 cM), D7Mit83 (26.5 cM) and D13Mit54 (35 cM), accounted for 90% of the genetic variance in cocaine difference scores. The results of the present study provide confirmation for a number of QTL on chromosomes 1, 5, 6, 9, 16 and 17 which were previously identified in the recombinant inbred AXB/BXA and BXD strains that share a common B6 ancestor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".