MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975790980 · doi:10.1017/s0022112005007500

Numerical modelling of convection in a reactive porous medium with a mobile mush–liquid interface

2006· article· en· W1975790980 on OpenAlexaff
S. L. Butler, Herbert E. Huppert, M. Grae Worster

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorous mediumMechanicsInterface (matter)ConvectionMaterials sciencePorosityPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a series of numerical simulations of dissolution-driven convection in a reactive porous medium heated from above. The physical system consists of a porous medium made of the frozen component of a binary mixture that is immersed in a liquid mixture with which it is in thermodynamic equilibrium. Surface heating results in melting of the uppermost material which releases dense solute and drives compositional convection. An interface develops between the upper region, in which the solid matrix has completely melted, and a lower region, in which the frozen solute evolves. The interface descends as melting proceeds. During the numerical simulations, scaled to be similar to previous experiments using potassium nitrate crystals and their saturated aqueous solution (Hallworth, Huppert & Woods, J. Fluid Mech. vol. 535, 2004, p. 255), there are three distinct phases: a purely conductive phase; followed by a phase with very brief, intense, compositionally driven convection; followed by a prolonged phase of more sedate compositionally driven convection in which the average kinetic energy is roughly one order of magnitude less than during the intense early phase. The field equations and the numerical methodology are presented in addition to a simple analytical model for the rate of motion of the interface. The analytical model, valid in the limit of very rapid mixing of the solute, is shown to be in good agreement with the numerical results of purely conductive calculations with a large diffusion coefficient. We investigate solutions for various values of the Rayleigh number and quantify the degree of interface motion as a function of this parameter. These simulations may be particularly applicable to problems associated with post-cumulate processes in magma chambers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207