MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975849522 · doi:10.1115/1.2748835

Fatigue Response and Characterization of 350WT Steel Under Semi-Random Loading

2006· article· en· W1975849522 on OpenAlexaff
Philip A. Rushton, Farid Taheri‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬, D. C. Stredulinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityMartec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplitudeExponential functionConstant (computer programming)Ultimate tensile strengthStructural engineeringCalibrationMaterials scienceStress (linguistics)Paris' lawComputer scienceComposite materialMathematicsEngineeringStatisticsMathematical analysisFracture mechanicsCrack closurePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Novel data obtained through experimental investigation into the fatigue response of 350WT steel, subjected to semi-random loading, comprised of various combinations of intermittent tensile overloads and compressive underloads are presented. An effective model for predicting the fatigue response is also introduced. For that, the capabilities of some of the currently available models are investigated and then an exponential delay model, being capable of accounting for the effects of not only overload ratio, but also stress ratio and overload/underload ratio is introduced. Since most variable amplitude models are based on a constant amplitude model, efforts were also expended to identify a constant amplitude fatigue crack growth model that would be easy to use, requiring the calibration of few (if any) empirical curve-fitting parameters. The integrity of a selected model is examined and results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pressure Vessel TechnologySame topicFatigue and fracture mechanicsFrench-language works237,207