MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975854580 · doi:10.1115/gt2014-26846

Efficient Time Resolved Multistage CFD Analysis Applied to Axial Compressors

2014· article· en· W1975854580 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsAnsys (Canada)
FundersSiemens
KeywordsGas compressorAxial compressorTurbomachineryComputational fluid dynamicsAerodynamicsTransient (computer programming)Computer scienceComputationSiemensImpellerControl theory (sociology)Mechanical engineeringEngineeringAlgorithmAerospace engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unsteady computations are necessary if blade row interactions effects are relevant, for example for detailed optimization of a compressor at off-design conditions towards the aerodynamic stability limit, or for structural mechanical tuning of the blades. Modeling time accurate transient multistage flow is expensive both in terms of computer time and memory. Recently the implicit time-resolved Time Transformation method (based on Giles’ time inclining) has been shown to be computationally efficient and a good alternative for modeling transient flow in a single stage (one pitch ratio) turbomachinery configuration. A further advantage of this time resolved method is its ability to capture not only blade passing frequencies but also self-excited frequencies such as in wakes and tip vortex shedding. In this work, an extension of the Time Transformation method (TT) to multistage modeling has been employed to assess the method’s ability in predicting modern multistage compressor performance speedline curve, as well as its ability in capturing dominant machine frequencies. The multistage TT method is verified on a two and a half stage modified Hannover compressor, followed by an industrial validation on a Siemens Energy half scale six stage axial compressor based on the last stages of the Siemens Platform Compressor (PCO). Reference transient solutions on reduced portions of the compressor and/or modified blade count solutions are obtained and compared directly to single passage multistage Time Transformation predictions for the Hannover compressor. The method is then applied directly to the full six stage Siemens compressor employing the true blade counts for all six stages. The first goal of this work is to investigate the ability and accuracy of the multistage TT method to capture all relevant blades passing frequencies, including the impact of different degrees of pitch change between components. The second goal of this work is to explore how best to apply the method for the prediction of a compressor map, up to the surge line. Solutions are compared to experimental test rig data. Physical explanations of the key flow features observed in the experiment, as well as of the differences between the predictions and experimental data, are given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it