MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975860293 · doi:10.1081/mst-120034251

Understanding and Characterizing the Drilling of Recycled Plastics

2004· article· en· W1975860293 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMachining Science and Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMachiningDrillingChip formationMechanical engineeringBrittlenessMaterials scienceChipProcess (computing)Charpy impact testTool wearEngineeringComposite materialComputer scienceToughness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recycled plastics are increasingly being used to manufacture planks used in large-volume applications, including decks, garden, and cloakroom chairs. These products, although manufactured near-to-net shape, often require drilling for assembly purposes. There are very limited data on the machining of plastic material. Manufacturers often rely on data and models established for metals. The machining of plastics, although limited to assembly purposes, or to the removal of excess materials, requires an understanding of the behavior of these materials during the machining in order to obtain better quality parts. It is even more important for recycled plastics, which are inhomogeneous, contain pores, and most often, are made with more than one type of product. This work analyzes the machining of recycled plastics in order to establish and compare their machining models with those traditionally used for metals, and to better understand the behavior of the plastics during machining. The workpiece is drilled at different process conditions and at different temperatures. The process performance indicators such as cutting forces, chip formation, and chip form are analyzed. The originality of this work resides in its study of chip formation and the effects of the preset workpiece temperature on the drilling mechanisms. It is found that there is a range of critical temperatures of transition for plastics similar to the Charpy impact ductile-brittle temperature separating the domain of low cutting force and long and spiral chip from that of high cutting force corresponding to the accordion-type of chip. A parameter describing this phenomenon is defined. It is also found that for low- to moderate-speed operations, the cutting speed has very little effect on the cutting forces, which depend mainly on the feed rate and the workpiece temperature. The relationship between the drilling forces and the feed rate established for metals remain valid, but the exponent of the feed rate for the thrust force is lower. The thrust force and the tangential force are proportional to the feed rate exponent 0.4 compared to 0.8 for metals when drilling workpiece at room temperature or below.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it