Une lutte contre « le plus forcené des Yankees » : Edmond de Nevers et les Irlandais des États-Unis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’une discussion portant sur les relations entre les Irlandais et les Canadiens français, cet article présente les grandes lignes de la pensée racialiste d’Edmond de Nevers (1862-1906), un auteur chez qui se lit sans doute le mieux la théorie des races qui dominait chez l’élite intellectuelle à son époque. L’incorporation annoncée des Canadiens français au sein de la grande République américaine représentait, à ses yeux, l’occasion d’une confrontation inévitable avec l’esprit collectif irlandais. Quelles seraient les relations entre ces deux groupes majoritairement catholiques ? Comment allaient-ils interagir ? Et surtout, qu’est-ce que la « science des races », telle qu’interprétée par Nevers, pouvait bien apprendre à ceux et celles qui tentaient de scruter l’avenir de l’Union américaine à un moment névralgique de son histoire ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".