Comparison of the thermal and histopathological effects of bipolar and monopolar electrosurgical resection of the prostate in a canine model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the thermal and histopathological effects of two commercially available bipolar systems and conventional monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a canine model. Bipolar TURP is an alternative to monopolar electrosurgery for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and has several potential clinical advantages, including the ability to use normal saline irrigation, enhanced haemostasis and less collateral thermal damage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In all, 12 adult male beagles were studied. After midline laparotomy and exposure of the bladder and prostate, two fibre-optic thermosensors were placed to record tissue temperatures; one sensor was placed into the substance of the prostate 2 cm from the urethra and the second in the prostatic-rectal groove on the capsular surface of the prostate to measure temperatures in the region of the neurovascular bundles. Through a midline cystotomy, antegrade TURP was performed using two different bipolar systems (Gyrus PlasmaKinetic and Vista, both from Gyrus-ACMI Corporation, Maple Grove, MN, USA) or a monopolar device (Force(TM) 2, Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA). TURP was performed in each lateral lobe using 24 F resection loops. The dogs were humanely killed acutely and the prostates excised for histopathological assessment. RESULTS: When comparing intraprostatic temperature data, the mean (sem) temperature changes recorded for the monopolar group were significantly higher than in either the Gyrus or Vista bipolar groups, at 24.2 (3.9) degrees C vs 8.1 (1.5) degrees C and 6.8 (1.8) degrees C, respectively (P < 0.001). No measurable temperature elevations were recorded near the neurovascular bundles with any of the electrosurgery devices. The depth of thermal damage was greatest in the monopolar group at 0.59 (0.27) mm compared with the Gyrus and Vista groups at 0.07 (0.08) mm and 0.15 (0.02) mm, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Bipolar TURP generated significantly less heat and histopathological evidence of thermal damage compared with monopolar TURP in the present canine model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".