MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison of the thermal and histopathological effects of bipolar and monopolar electrosurgical resection of the prostate in a canine model

2009· article· en· W1975874596 on OpenAlexaff
Raymond Ko, Andrew Tan, Ben H. Chew, P. Elaine Rowe, Hassan Razvi

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Urology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurovascular bundleProstateMedicineProstatectomyElectrosurgeryHyperplasiaProstatic urethraTransurethral resection of the prostateUrethraUrologySurgeryNuclear medicinePathologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To compare the thermal and histopathological effects of two commercially available bipolar systems and conventional monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a canine model. Bipolar TURP is an alternative to monopolar electrosurgery for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and has several potential clinical advantages, including the ability to use normal saline irrigation, enhanced haemostasis and less collateral thermal damage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In all, 12 adult male beagles were studied. After midline laparotomy and exposure of the bladder and prostate, two fibre-optic thermosensors were placed to record tissue temperatures; one sensor was placed into the substance of the prostate 2 cm from the urethra and the second in the prostatic-rectal groove on the capsular surface of the prostate to measure temperatures in the region of the neurovascular bundles. Through a midline cystotomy, antegrade TURP was performed using two different bipolar systems (Gyrus PlasmaKinetic and Vista, both from Gyrus-ACMI Corporation, Maple Grove, MN, USA) or a monopolar device (Force(TM) 2, Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA). TURP was performed in each lateral lobe using 24 F resection loops. The dogs were humanely killed acutely and the prostates excised for histopathological assessment. RESULTS: When comparing intraprostatic temperature data, the mean (sem) temperature changes recorded for the monopolar group were significantly higher than in either the Gyrus or Vista bipolar groups, at 24.2 (3.9) degrees C vs 8.1 (1.5) degrees C and 6.8 (1.8) degrees C, respectively (P < 0.001). No measurable temperature elevations were recorded near the neurovascular bundles with any of the electrosurgery devices. The depth of thermal damage was greatest in the monopolar group at 0.59 (0.27) mm compared with the Gyrus and Vista groups at 0.07 (0.08) mm and 0.15 (0.02) mm, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Bipolar TURP generated significantly less heat and histopathological evidence of thermal damage compared with monopolar TURP in the present canine model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of UrologySame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207