Atomic Carbon as a Terminal Ligand: Studies of a Carbidomolybdenum Anion Featuring Solid-State <sup>13</sup>C NMR Data and Proton-Transfer Self-Exchange Kinetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anion [CMo(N[R]Ar)(3)](-) (R = C(CD(3))(2)CH(3) or (t)Bu, Ar = 3,5-C(6)H(3)Me(2)) containing one-coordinate carbon as a terminal substituent and related molecules have been studied by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, solution and solid-state (13)C NMR spectroscopy, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Chemical reactivity patterns for [CMo(N[R]Ar)(3)](-) have been investigated, including the kinetics of proton-transfer self-exchange involving HCMo(N[R]Ar)(3), the carbidomolybdenum anion's conjugate acid. While the Mo triple bond C bond lengths in [K(benzo-15-crown-5)(2)][CMo(N[R]Ar)(3)] and the parent methylidyne, HCMo(N[R]Ar)(3), are statistically identical, the carbide chemical shift of delta 501 ppm is much larger than the delta 282 ppm shift for the methylidyne. Solid-state (13)C NMR studies show the carbide to have a much larger chemical shift anisotropy (CSA, 806 ppm) and smaller (95)Mo--(13)C coupling constant (60 Hz) than the methylidyne (CSA = 447 ppm, (1)J(MoC) = 130 Hz). DFT calculations on model compounds indicate also that there is an increasing MoC overlap population on going from the methylidyne to the terminal carbide. The pK(a) of methylidyne HCMo(N[R]Ar)(3) is approximately 30 in THF solution. Methylidyne HCMo(N[R]Ar)(3) and carbide [CMo(N[R]Ar)(3)](-) undergo extremely rapid proton-transfer self-exchange reactions in THF, with k = 7 x 10(6) M(-1) s(-1). Besides being a strong reducing agent, carbide [CMo(N[R]Ar)(3)](-) reacts as a nucleophile with elemental chalcogens to form carbon-chalcogen bonds and likewise reacts with PCl(3) to furnish a carbon-phosphorus bond.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".