First Trimester Fetal Heart Rate: Response to Chorionic Villus Sampling in the Chromosomally Normal Fetus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the fetal heart rate before and after the procedure and whether this had any effect on the risk of pregnancy loss following chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and chromosomally normal pregnancies. Four hundred and seventeen pregnancies were evaluated. The heart rate before the procedure was similar for both male and female fetuses. Significant procedure-related changes in fetal heart rate occurred only with male fetuses undergoing the transabdominal CVS technique. Fetal heart rate decelerations following CVS were more common than accelerations. Fetal heart rate changes following CVS were not able to predict the pregnancies ending in spontaneous abortion. Transabdominal CVS had a lower loss rate after the procedure, compared to the transcervical technique (p = 0.0001). Small-for-date fetuses had a higher loss rate after the procedure compared to normal-sized fetuses (p = 0.001).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".