MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975899245 · doi:10.2118/84270-ms

Prediction of and Effective Preventative Solution for Annular Fluid Pressure Buildup on Subsea Completed Wells-Case Study

2003· article· en· W1975899245 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWellheadSubseaCasingAnnulus (botany)Petroleum engineeringCompressibilityVolume (thermodynamics)MechanicsGeologyDrilling fluidMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringThermodynamicsDrillingComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Trapped fluid commonly occurs in subsea completed wells when casing annuli attains a closed volume; for example, a subsea wellhead set and cement top inside the previous casing shoe. When the well is placed on production and wellhead temperature increases, the trapped fluid, usually drilling mud and spacer, expands. This thermal expansion significantly increases the annular pressure. Depending on the initial wellhead conditions, the trapped fluid's temperature could increase in excess of 83ºC (150º F) over ambient conditions. Laboratory testing indicates that trapped water- or synthetic oil-based fluids can increase in pressure (greater than 69 MPa or 10,000 psi) well above the casing collapse pressure if the well experiences such a differential temperature cycle. An effective solution offered in previous literature is the incorporation of a compressible spacer in the cementing process. The compressible spacer is trapped in the closed annulus and can greatly reduce the pressure buildup if fluid expansion occurs. Deepwater operators have used this solution in a casual manner because the margin for error is somewhat large. However, in shallower subsea completed wells (less than 300m or 1,000 ft water depth), the margin of error is greatly reduced. This reduction motivates the need to find the optimal compressible spacer volume based on lower final hydrostatic pressures and appropriate volume to compensate for fluid expansion. Operationally, finding these optimal volumes helps reduce the chance of a kick condition or compressible fluid being circulated into the riser system. This paper presents a method for calculating the optimal amount of compressible spacer to be trapped in a well's annulus. The calculations consider the expansion of the trapped fluid based on annular volume and fluid type(s). The paper also presents previously published data on various water and synthetic oil-based fluids and an example of the calculations in well conditions for an east-coast Canadian subsea well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it