MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975899245 · doi:10.2118/84270-ms

Prediction of and Effective Preventative Solution for Annular Fluid Pressure Buildup on Subsea Completed Wells-Case Study

2003· article· en· W1975899245 on OpenAlexaffabout
Toni Loder, Jason H. Evans, James Griffith

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWellheadSubseaCasingAnnulus (botany)Petroleum engineeringCompressibilityVolume (thermodynamics)MechanicsGeologyDrilling fluidMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringThermodynamicsDrillingComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Trapped fluid commonly occurs in subsea completed wells when casing annuli attains a closed volume; for example, a subsea wellhead set and cement top inside the previous casing shoe. When the well is placed on production and wellhead temperature increases, the trapped fluid, usually drilling mud and spacer, expands. This thermal expansion significantly increases the annular pressure. Depending on the initial wellhead conditions, the trapped fluid's temperature could increase in excess of 83ºC (150º F) over ambient conditions. Laboratory testing indicates that trapped water- or synthetic oil-based fluids can increase in pressure (greater than 69 MPa or 10,000 psi) well above the casing collapse pressure if the well experiences such a differential temperature cycle. An effective solution offered in previous literature is the incorporation of a compressible spacer in the cementing process. The compressible spacer is trapped in the closed annulus and can greatly reduce the pressure buildup if fluid expansion occurs. Deepwater operators have used this solution in a casual manner because the margin for error is somewhat large. However, in shallower subsea completed wells (less than 300m or 1,000 ft water depth), the margin of error is greatly reduced. This reduction motivates the need to find the optimal compressible spacer volume based on lower final hydrostatic pressures and appropriate volume to compensate for fluid expansion. Operationally, finding these optimal volumes helps reduce the chance of a kick condition or compressible fluid being circulated into the riser system. This paper presents a method for calculating the optimal amount of compressible spacer to be trapped in a well's annulus. The calculations consider the expansion of the trapped fluid based on annular volume and fluid type(s). The paper also presents previously published data on various water and synthetic oil-based fluids and an example of the calculations in well conditions for an east-coast Canadian subsea well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207