Vibrational Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy of Three Multidentate Nitrogen Donor Ligands: Conformational Flexibility and Solvent Effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of multidentate nitrogen donor ligands have been synthesized and characterized and their conformational distributions in solution have been investigated. Vibrational absorption (VA) and vibrational circular dichroism (VCD) spectroscopy, complemented with DFT calculations, have been used to probe the conformations of these important ligands in solution directly. These three ligands demonstrate very different conformational flexibility; the pyridine subunits and amine groups may adopt a number of different conformations. Experimental VA and VCD data measured in CDCl3 have been compared to the theoretical spectra of all possible most stable conformers. Solvent effects have been taken into account by using the implicit polarizable continuum model and explicit solvation model. The explicit hydrogen-bonding solvation model is important for explaining the VCD sign-reverse phenomenon in the amide I region. Good agreement has been achieved between experimental and predicted spectra for all three ligands; thus allowing detailed examination of the related conformational structures and distributions in solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".