MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975919614 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.121445

Dr. Ajeganova and Dr. Hafström reply

2013· letter· en· W1975919614 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sofia Ajeganova, Ingiäld Hafström

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConfoundingDiabetes mellitusMultivariate analysisMultivariate statisticsGerontologyDemographyFamily medicineInternal medicineStatisticsEndocrinologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: We thank Dr. Kawada for the comments1 about our study2. We agree that multivariate analysis is indispensable in predictive models of risk factors, and also support the discussion of the applied statistical approach. However, we would clarify that our analyses were developed first to take into account known and measurable confounders such as age, sex, ever-smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and body weight. As only age, … Address correspondence to Dr. Ajeganova; E-mail: sofia.ajeganova{at}karolinska.se

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0270.036
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.346
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsFrench-language works237,207