Rapid Prediction of Solvation Free Energy. 2. The First-Shell Hydration (FiSH) Continuum Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Local ordering of water in the first hydration shell around a solute is different from isotropic bulk water. This leads to effects that are captured by explicit solvation models and missed by continuum solvation models which replace the explicit waters with a continuous medium. In this paper, we introduce the First-Shell Hydration (FiSH) model as a first attempt to introduce first-shell effects within a continuum solvation framework. One such effect is charge asymmetry, which is captured by a modified electrostatic term within the FiSH model by introducing a nonlinear correction of atomic Born radii based on the induced surface charge density. A hybrid van der Waals formulation consisting of two continuum zones has been implemented. A shell of water restricted to and uniformly distributed over the solvent-accessible surface (SAS) represents the first solvation shell. A second region starting one solvent diameter away from the SAS is treated as bulk water with a uniform density function. Both the electrostatic and van der Waals terms of the FiSH model have been calibrated against linear interaction energy (LIE) data from molecular dynamics simulations. Extensive testing of the FiSH model was carried out on large hydration data sets including both simple compounds and drug-like molecules. The FiSH model accurately reproduces contributing terms, absolute predictions relative to experimental hydration free energies, and functional class trends of LIE MD simulations. Overall, the implementation of the FiSH model achieves a very acceptable performance and transferability improving over previously developed solvation models, while being complemented by a sound physical foundation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".