Novel Surface-Smoothing Based Local Gyrification Index
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quantication of cortical surface folding is important in identifying and classifying many neurodegenerative diseases. Much work has been done to identify regional and global brain folding, and in this paper we review some of these methods, as well as propose a new method that has advantages over the existing state of art. Using our novel proposed method, we mapped the local gyrification index on the cortical surface for subjects with mild Alzheimer's dementia (n=20) , very mild dementia (n=23) and age-matched healthy subjects (n=52). In our experiments we find a consistent pattern of gyrification changes in the dementia subjects, with regions generally affected early on in the progression of Alzheimer pathology, including medial temporal lobe, and cingulate gyrus, having decreased gyrification. At the same time we observe increased gyrification in dementia subjects, in frontal, anterior temporal and posteriorly located regions. We speculate that in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer Disease, the folding of the entire cortical mantle undergoes dynamic changes as regional atrophy begins and expands, with both decreases and increases in gyrification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".