MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975955844 · doi:10.1115/ajtec2011-44203

Development of Diesel Engine Emissions Control Models Based on Heat Release Rate Analysis of Combustion Processes

2011· article· en· W1975955844 on OpenAlexafffund
Dong Wang, Chao Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueASME/JSME 2011 8th Thermal Engineering Joint Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMax-Planck-Gesellschaft
KeywordsNOxSootCombustionDiesel engineDiesel fuelEnvironmental scienceExhaust gas recirculationController (irrigation)Automotive engineeringWaste managementChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Linear control models to control the Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and soot emissions from a diesel engine were developed through numerical simulations. A modified KIVA-3V code was used to calculate the NOx and soot formations in a direct injection diesel engine under different operating conditions. The following relationships between the pollutant formations and the heat release rate were observed: 1) NOx formation amount is related to the peak value of the heat release rate and the timing of the premixed combustion; 2) soot formation amount is related to the peak heat release rate and the soot oxidation amount is related to the timing of the premixed combustion. Based on the above observations, linear control models for NOx and soot emissions were constructed. The NOx control model developed through the numerical simulations was implemented into the controller of an EGR valve on a small diesel engine. The experimental results showed that the NOx control model was effective in reducing NOx emissions under high RPM conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME/JSME 2011 8th Thermal Engineering Joint ConferenceSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207