MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975958467 · doi:10.1049/el.2010.2332

Highly-linear CMOS cross-coupled compensator transconductor with enhanced tunability

2010· article· en· W1975958467 on OpenAlexaff
Ziad El-Khatib, Leonard MacEachern, S. Mahmoud

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSLinearitydBcElectronic engineeringBiasingVoltageSIGNAL (programming language)Flatness (cosmology)Dynamic rangeDistortion (music)Differential gainControl theory (sociology)Materials scienceEngineeringPhysicsComputer scienceAmplifierElectrical engineeringOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proposed is the design of a CMOS highly-linear differential cross-coupled compensator transconductor that combines both cross-quad and cascomp linearisation techniques with enhanced tunability. The proposed cross-coupled compensator linearises the total drain current while maintaining a high input voltage swing range. It achieves a wide tunable gm” nulling over 500 mV differential input signal and a tunable 50% increase in gm flatness. The proposed linearised transconductor achieves a measured 20 dB IM3 distortion reduction after linearisation. The linearised transconductor enhanced tunability technique achieves IM3 better than −78 dBc at 1 GHz at an optimum bias condition with ease and precision without reducing the linear signal handling capability, thus improving the overall transconductor dynamic range performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207