MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fatigue Damage in On-Axis and Off-Axis Woven-Fiber/Resin Composite

2011· article· en· W1975969509 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialAnisotropyStiffnessComposite numberUltimate tensile strengthFiberTensile testingWoven fabricLong axisStress (linguistics)Structural engineeringGeometryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study the tensile static and fatigue behaviour of a woven-fabric laminate is investigated in both the on-axis and off-axis material directions. Emphasis is placed on the development of damage and its influence on the stress-strain behaviour of the laminate. The test results illustrate that there is a high degree of anisotropic behaviour due to anisotropic damage development, which is evident by the variation of the material behaviour between the on-axis and off-axis test specimens. The fatigue tests also suggest that the on-axis specimens exhibit noticeable stiffness degradation, while the off-axis specimens do not. The qualitative results provide significant insight into the type of damage mechanism responsible for the observed behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it