New Side-On Bound Dinitrogen Complexes of Zirconium Supported by an Arene-Bridged Diamidophosphine Ligand and Their Reactivity with Dihydrogen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new dinitrogen complex, deep blue-green {[NPN]*Zr(THF)}(2)(mu-eta(2):eta(2)-N(2)) ([NPN]* = {[N-(2,4,6-Me(3)C(6)H(2))(2-N-5-MeC(6)H(3))](2)PPh}), was prepared in high yield by the reduction of [NPN]*ZrCl(2) with 2.2 equiv of KC(8) in THF under N(2). The solid-state molecular structure shows that N(2) is strongly activated (N-N bond length: 1.503(6) A) and bound side-on to two Zr atoms. Coordinated THF can be readily replaced by adding pyridine (py) or PMe(2)R (R = Me, Ph) to the complex to obtain {[NPN]*Zr(py)}(2)(mu-eta(2):eta(2)-N(2)) or {[NPN]*Zr(PMe(2)R)}(mu-eta(2):eta(2)-N(2)){Zr[NPN]*} in high yield. X-ray diffraction experiments show that the N(2) moiety is strongly activated and remains side-on bound to Zr for the py and PMe(2)Ph adducts; interestingly, only one PMe(2)Ph coordinates to the Zr(2)N(2) unit. {[NPN]*Zr(PMe(2)R)}(mu-eta(2):eta(2)-N(2)){Zr[NPN]*} reacts slowly with H(2) to provide {[NPN]*Zr(PMe(2)R)}(mu-H)(mu-eta(2):eta(2)-N(2)H){Zr[NPN]*}, as determined by isotopic labeling, and multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. The THF adduct does not react with H(2) even after an extended period, whereas the pyridine adduct does undergo a reaction with H(2), but to a mixture of products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".