MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1976021042 · doi:10.1029/2006gl027644

Discontinuities in the late 1960's in different atmospheric data products

2006· article· en· W1976021042 on OpenAlexafffund
Holger Pohlmann, Richard J. Greatbatch

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationMet OfficeCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsClassification of discontinuitiesTroposphereClimatologyPrecipitationEnvironmental scienceAtmosphere (unit)Atmospheric sciencesAtmospheric circulationGeologyMeteorologyGeographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analysis of the onset and spatial extent of discontinuities in the late 1960's in different atmospheric data products is performed. Discontinuities are found in both the NCEP/NCAR and ERA‐40 reanalyses in various surface variables including sea level pressure (SLP) in both data sets over Africa, in the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis also over Asia and in the ERA‐40 reanalysis also over South America, and precipitation in the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis over North Africa. Discontinuities are also found in 2 m air temperature in both reanalyses. The discontinuities in SLP extend into the lower troposphere. The main cause of these discontinuities appears to be missing or limited synoptic data prior to the late 1960's.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicClimate variability and models→French-language works237,207→