MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1976040462 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.140054

Withholding and withdrawing treatment in Canada: implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in the <i>Rasouli</i> case

2014· article· en· W1976040462 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
James Downar, Robert Sibbald, Tracey M. Bailey, Brian P. Kavanagh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoAlberta Glycomics CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupreme courtConsciousnessSupreme Court DecisionsMedicineLawPublic domainSurgeryPolitical scienceGeneral surgeryPsychologyNeuroscienceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following is a summary from information in the public domain: Hassan Rasouli underwent surgery for a benign brain tumour in 2010, but a postoperative infection resulted in severe brain damage and minimal consciousness. At the time the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision, he remained at

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0390.013
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0330.039
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues→French-language works237,207→