MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Una élite rural. Los grandes ganaderos andaluces, siglos XIV-XX

2005· article· es· W1976061860 on OpenAlex
Antonio Luis López Martínez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHispania · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En las grandes explotaciones agrarias de la Baja Andalucía la ganadería jugaba un papel tan importante como los cultivos agrícolas. En este tipo de explotaciones la ganadería estaba estrechamente vinculada a la agricultura a la que suministraba trabajo, abonos y dinero en metálico, al tiempo que los ganados se beneficiaban de los barbechos y de los residuos de las cosechas. Dada esta vinculación las figuras del gran agricultor y gran ganadero se fundían en una misma persona que era la del gran labrador que dirigía la explotación agraria. Este gran labrador aprovechaba su importancia económica y social para imponer su poder en los concejos municipales, a fin de inclinar en su propio beneficio la explotación de los espacios rurales colectivos en los que mantenía su ganado durante buena parte del año.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it