MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976145299 · doi:10.1260/0958-305x.22.5.579

The Future of the Canadian Oil Stands: Engineering and Project Management Advances

2011· article· en· W1976145299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Environment · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineeringScheduleProject managementProcurementContext (archaeology)Quality assuranceSystems engineeringConstruction engineeringEngineering managementOperations managementComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses production technology and project management developments in the Canadian oil sands industry, in the context of AMEC's experience as a consultant and EPCM service provider to lease holders, developers and operators. Mineable and in situ oil sands developments are described, along with methods for and challenges of various production types of in situ, including Cold Flow, Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS), Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD), Toe to Heel Air Injection (THAI), and VAPEX. Effective project management and supporting systems are critical to achieve cost and schedule targets on large, complex projects performed by AMEC. Workfront planning is essential to achieve optimum construction execution and a best value project. Construction Work Packages (CWPs) divide the work into discrete pieces and the Construction Work Execution Plan influences scheduling of engineering and procurement deliverables. Integration of the schedules and linking to the required on site (ROS) dates of the CWP scopes minimizes workfront duration requirements, allowing progressive completion of systems. AMEC's Engineering Data Warehouse (EDW) works with centrally-hosted, intelligent engineering design tools to assist in achieving tight cost and schedule targets. The EDW ensures all information related to a given piece of equipment is consistent across all systems, supporting quality assurance of engineering data between AMEC, its sub-contractors and supervised contractors. Once verified and consolidated, the information becomes part of a Master Tag Register (MTR), improving AMEC's ability to meet contractual turnover requirements for data quality, completeness and accuracy. Health, safety, security and environmental (HSSE) systems are proactively developed and AMEC's progressive improvement in safety performance over the years is demonstrated. The improvement is due in part to the company's Beyond Zero program, designed to achieve sustainable, world-class HSSE performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.133
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it