MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976145299 · doi:10.1260/0958-305x.22.5.579

The Future of the Canadian Oil Stands: Engineering and Project Management Advances

2011· article· en· W1976145299 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Madden, Jacek D. Morawski

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Environment · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineeringScheduleProject managementProcurementContext (archaeology)Quality assuranceSystems engineeringConstruction engineeringEngineering managementOperations managementComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses production technology and project management developments in the Canadian oil sands industry, in the context of AMEC's experience as a consultant and EPCM service provider to lease holders, developers and operators. Mineable and in situ oil sands developments are described, along with methods for and challenges of various production types of in situ, including Cold Flow, Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS), Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD), Toe to Heel Air Injection (THAI), and VAPEX. Effective project management and supporting systems are critical to achieve cost and schedule targets on large, complex projects performed by AMEC. Workfront planning is essential to achieve optimum construction execution and a best value project. Construction Work Packages (CWPs) divide the work into discrete pieces and the Construction Work Execution Plan influences scheduling of engineering and procurement deliverables. Integration of the schedules and linking to the required on site (ROS) dates of the CWP scopes minimizes workfront duration requirements, allowing progressive completion of systems. AMEC's Engineering Data Warehouse (EDW) works with centrally-hosted, intelligent engineering design tools to assist in achieving tight cost and schedule targets. The EDW ensures all information related to a given piece of equipment is consistent across all systems, supporting quality assurance of engineering data between AMEC, its sub-contractors and supervised contractors. Once verified and consolidated, the information becomes part of a Master Tag Register (MTR), improving AMEC's ability to meet contractual turnover requirements for data quality, completeness and accuracy. Health, safety, security and environmental (HSSE) systems are proactively developed and AMEC's progressive improvement in safety performance over the years is demonstrated. The improvement is due in part to the company's Beyond Zero program, designed to achieve sustainable, world-class HSSE performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.133
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & EnvironmentSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207