MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W197615653

Rational Design of a Computer-based Decision Support System for Primary Care Settings.

2000· article· en· W197615653 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K.B. Langton, Jane P. Kerby, Vladen Janjusevic, Karim Keshavjee, Anne Holbrook

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary careElectronic medical recordComputer scienceMedical recordDecision support systemInterpretation (philosophy)Clinical decision support systemData sciencePatient recordData miningMedicineMedical emergencyFamily medicineInternet privacy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Setting: The COMPETE Study (Computerization of Medical Practices for the Enhancement of Therapeutic Effectiveness) is an electronic medical record (EMR) project based in a primary care setting in Southern Ontario, Canada. The Clinical Research database consists of data extracted from the EMR as described below in the Methods section. Interpretation of the data has proven challenging due to factors such as variability in physician recording behavior, ambiguities posed by data entered as text and discrepancies between administrative and EMR data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicElectronic Health Records SystemsFrench-language works237,207