MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976167744 · doi:10.4043/23846-ms

HVDC Enables Subsea Active Production Technology

2012· article· en· W1976167744 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Voight

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaBuoyEngineeringSubmarine pipelineMarine engineeringPower transmissionElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Automotive engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A growing number of projects are employing some form of subsea processing. Integrated system approaches to subsea processing, commonly known as SubseaActive Processing Technologies (SAPT), can require a great deal of power. Subsea boosting and/or separation pumps can easily reach 3 MW each; withmultiple pump installations quickly adding up to a substantial demand on a hostfacility. When the power transmission distances approach 100 km or more, ACpower distribution becomes less and less practical. For this reason, powerindustry leaders envision the future installation of offshore electricalutility infrastructures based on High Voltage DC (HVDC) TransmissionTechnology, just as they are presently employed for land based utilities. Taking advantage of these large HVDC offshore power grids for small, isolatedsubsea installations requiring only moderate power levels calls for adaptingHVDC technology to a scale sized to the power requirements of theseinstallations. The HVDC Power Buoy concept, proposed for isolated SAPTinstallations requiring subsea power in the range of 10 to 20 MW, is one suchadaptation. This paper will present the HVDC Power Buoy concept and its keycomponents; the benefits and drivers for its development; the perceivedqualification challenges as well as the target applications for thetechnology. Introduction To introduce the HVDC Power Buoy concept, a subsea completion, with subseaprocessing included, with a tieback distance of 150 km and a total subsea powerrequirement of 15MVA @ 0.7 PF (10.5 MW) is used as a demonstrative test case. First, the case of providing AC power to the subsea completion is considered toillustrate the issues associated with AC power transmission. Then, as analternative, an HVDC Power Buoy with a HVDC power transmission link ispresented to show the advantages of this approach. Since the HVDC PowerBuoy is a new concept, the technical gaps are then identified with suggestedpaths forward to mitigate said gaps. By enabling the use of HVDC powertransmission, the HVDC Power Buoy concept is expected to make Subsea ActiveProcessing Technology practical for many isolated and otherwise stranded subseafields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC Arctic Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207