Main Chain and Side Chain Dynamics of the Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme Variant Human Mms2 in the Free and Ubiquitin-Bound States
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein ubiquitination involves a cascade of enzymatic steps where ubiquitin (Ub) is sequentially transferred as a thiolester intermediate from an E1 enzyme to an E2 enzyme and finally to the protein target with the help of a Ub-protein ligase. Protein ubiquitination brought about by the Ubc13-Mms2 (E2-E2) complex has a unique role in the cell, unrelated to protein degradation. The Mms2-Ubc13 heterodimer links Ub molecules to one another through an isopeptide bond between its own C-terminus and Lys-63 on another Ub. The role of Mms2 is to orient a target-bound Ub molecule such that its Lys-63 is proximal to the C-terminus of the Ub molecule that is covalently linked to the active site of Ubc13. To gain insight into the influence of protein dynamics on the affinity of Ub for Mms2, we have determined pico- to nanosecond time scale fluctuations of the main chain and methyl side chains of human Mms2 in the free and Ub-bound states using solution state (15)N and (2)H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation measurements. Analysis of the relaxation data allows for a semiquantitative estimation of the conformational entropy change (TDeltaS(NMR)) for the main chain and side chain methyl groups of Mms2 upon binding Ub. The value of TDeltaS(NMR) for the main chain and side chain methyl groups of Mms2 is -8 +/- 2 and -2 +/- 2 kcal mol(-)(1), respectively. The experimental DeltaG(binding) for the Mms2.Ub complex is -6 kcal mol(-)(1). Estimation of DeltaG(binding) using an empirical structure-based approach that does not account for changes in main chain entropy yields a value of -17 +/- 2 kcal mol(-)(1). However, inclusion of TDeltaS(NMR) for the main chain of Mms2 increases the estimated DeltaG(binding) to -9 +/- 3 kcal mol(-)(1). Assuming that changes in Ub main chain dynamics contribute to TDeltaS(NMR) to the same extent as Mms2, the estimated DeltaG(binding) is further reduced to -1 +/- 4 kcal mol(-)(1), a value close to the experimental DeltaG(binding).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".